Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis. DESIGN: Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis. SETTING: Virginia hospitals performing HTx. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use). CONCLUSIONS: Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Statewide data on surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: The data provide a path forward.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF), if left untreated, is associated with increased intermediate and long-term morbidity/mortality. Surgical treatment for AF is lacking standardization in patient selection and lesion set, despite clear support from multi-society guidelines. The aim of this study was to analyze a statewide cardiac surgery registry to establish whether or not there is an association between center volume and type of index procedure with performance of surgical ablation (SA) for AF, the lesion set chosen, and ablation technology used. METHODS: Adult, first-time, nonemergency patients with preoperative AF between 2014 and 2022 excluding standalone SA procedures from a statewide registry of Society of Thoracic Surgeons data were included (N = 4320). AF treatment variability by hospital volume (ordered from smallest to largest) and surgery type were examined with χ2 analyses. Hospital-level Spearman correlations compared hospital volume with proportion of AF patients treated with SA. RESULTS: Overall, 37% of patients with AF were ablated at the time of surgery (63% of mitral procedures, 26% of non-mitrals) and 15% had left atrial appendage management only. There was a significant temporal trend of increasing performance of SA for AF over time (Cochran-Armitage = 27.8; P < .001). Hospital cardiac surgery volume did not correlate with the proportion of AF patients treated with SA (rs = 0.19; P = .603) with a rate of SA below the state average for academic centers. Of cases with SA (n = 1582), only 43% had a biatrial lesion set. Procedures that involved mitral surgery were more likely to include a biatrial lesion set (χ2 = 392.3; P < .001) for both paroxysmal and persistent AF. Similarly, ablation technology use was variable by type of concomitant operation (χ2 = 219.0; P < .001) such that radiofrequency energy was more likely to be used in non-mitral procedures. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate an increase in adoption of SA for AF over time. No association between greater hospital volume or academic status and performance of SA for AF was established. Similar to national data, the type of index procedure remains the most consistent factor in the decision to perform SA with a disconnect between AF pathophysiology and decision making on the type of SA performed. This analysis demonstrates a gap between evidence-based guidelines and real-world practice, highlighting an opportunity to confer the benefits of concomitant SA to more patients.

Unexpected impact of preoperative anemia in low-risk isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or single-valve surgical patients: Do not overlook these patients in anemia management!

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative anemia is prevalent in cardiac surgery and independently associated with increased risk for short-term and long-term mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of preoperative hematocrit (Hct) on outcomes in cardiac surgical patients and whether the effect is comparable across levels of Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS PROM). METHODS: The study consisted of adult, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or single-valve surgical patients in a statewide registry from 2011 to 2022 (N = 29,828). Regressions were used to assess effect of preoperative Hct on STS-defined major morbidity/mortality including the interaction of Hct and STS PROM as continuous variables. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years (58-73 years), STS PROM was 1.02% (0.58%-1.99%), and preoperative Hct was 39.5% (35.8%-42.8%). The sample consisted of 78% isolated CABG (n = 23,261), 10% isolated mitral valve repair/replacement (n = 3119), 12% isolated aortic valve replacement (n = 3448), and 29% were female (n = 8646). Multivariable analyses found that greater Hct was associated with reduced risk of STS-defined morbidity/mortality (odds ratio, 0.96; P < .001). These effects for Hct persisted even after adjustment for intraoperative blood transfusion. The interaction of Hct and STS PROM was significant for morbidity/mortality (odds ratio, 1.01; P < .001). There was a stronger association between Hct levels and morbidity/mortality risk in the patients with the lowest STS risk compared with patients with the greatest STS risk. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lower risk had a greater association between preoperative Hct and major morbidity and mortality compared with patients with greater risk. Preoperative anemia management is essential across all risk groups for improved outcomes.

Multiple Arterial Graft Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Surgeon Perspective vs Practice.

BACKGROUND: Despite supportive evidence and guidelines, the use of multiple arterial grafts (MAGs) in coronary artery bypass grafting remains low. We sought to determine surgeon perception of personal MAG use and compare this with actual MAG use. METHODS: We conducted a statewide surgeon survey of MAG use, presence of a hospital MAG protocol, and barriers for MAG use, with a response rate of 78% (n = 25). Surgeon survey responses were compared with actual Society of Thoracic Surgeons patient data from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020 using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 5299 patients who had first-time, nonemergent, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (≥2 grafts) by responding surgeons, 16% received MAG (n = 825). MAG use in patients whose surgeons self-designated as "routine" MAG users was 21% vs 7% for "nonroutine" users. Surgeons with a hospital protocol for MAG use utilized MAG more often (18% vs 14%, P = .001). Surgeons who were unconvinced by the data on the benefits of MAGs used MAGs in 11% vs 22% in surgeons who were convinced. MAG use increased over time, particularly from before to after the survey (13.1% vs 30.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although MAG use increased over time, barriers to routine use remain. In surgeons who reported routine use, only 21% of their patients received MAGs. Hospital protocols, education, and increased awareness may reduce barriers to use and encourage evidence-based clinical practice.

Association of Radial Artery Access with Reduced Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury.

Objectives: To determine if radial artery (RA) access compared with femoral artery (FA) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Background: AKI results in substantial morbidity and cost following PCI. Prior studies comparing the occurrence of AKI associated with radial artery (RA) versus femoral artery (FA) access have mixed results. Methods: Using a large state-wide database, 14,077 patients (8,539 with RA and 5,538 patents with FA access) were retrospectively compared to assess the occurrence of AKI following PCI. To reduce selection bias and balance clinical data across the two groups, a novel machine learning method called a Generalized Boosted Model was conducted on the arterial access site generating a weighted propensity score for each variable. A logistic regression analysis was then performed on the occurrence of AKI following PCI using the weighted propensity scores from the Generalized Boosted Model. Results: As shown in other studies, multiple variables were associated with an increase in AKI after PCI. Only RA access (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.91) and male gender (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.72-0.89) were associated with a lower occurrence of AKI. Based on the calculated Mehran scores, patients were stratified into groups with an increasing risk of AKI. RA access was consistently found to have a lower risk of AKI compared with FA access across these groups of increasing risk. Conclusions: Compared with FA access, RA access is associated with an 18% lower rate of AKI following PCI. This effect was observed among different levels of risk for developing AKI. Although developed from a retrospective analysis, this study supports the use of RA access when technically possible in a diverse group of patients.

Barriers to atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 40% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing mitral valve surgery do not receive concomitant ablation despite societal guidelines. We assessed barriers to implementation of this evidence-based practice through a survey of cardiac surgeons in 2 statewide quality collaboratives. METHODS: Adult cardiac surgeons across 2 statewide collaboratives were surveyed on their knowledge and practice regarding AF ablation. Questions concerning experience, clinical practice, case scenarios, and barriers to implementation were included. RESULTS: Among 66 respondents (66 of 135; 48.9%), the majority reported "very comfortable/frequently use" cryoablation (53 of 66; 80.3%) and radiofrequency (55 of 66; 83.3%). Only 12.1% (8/66) were not aware of the recommendations. Approximately one-half of the respondents reported learning AF ablation in fellowship (50.0%; 33 of 66) or attending courses (47.0%; 31 of 66). Responses to clinical scenarios demonstrated wide variability in practice patterns. One-half of the respondents reported no barriers; others cited increased cross-clamp time, excessive patient risk, and arrhythmia incidence as obstacles. Desired interventions included cardiology/electrophysiology support, protocols, pacemaker rate information, and education in the form of site visits, videos and proctors. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of evidence-based recommendations and practice patterns vary widely. These data identify several barriers to implementation of concomitant AF ablation and suggest specific interventions (mentorship/support, protocols, research, and education) to overcome these barriers.

Hospital variability in modifiable factors driving coronary artery bypass charges.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with significant interhospital variability in charges. Drivers of hospital charge variability remain elusive. We identified modifiable factors associated with statewide interhospital variability in hospital charges for coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Charge data were used as a surrogate for cost. Society of Thoracic Surgeons data from Maryland institutions and charge data from the Maryland Health Care Commission were linked to characterize interhospital charge variability for coronary artery bypass grafting. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify perioperative factors independently related to coronary artery bypass grafting charges. Of the factors independently associated with charges, we analyzed which factors varied between hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 10,337 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at 9 Maryland hospitals from 2012 to 2016, of whom 7532 patients were available for analyses. Mean normalized charges for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting varied significantly among hospitals, ranging from $30,000 to $57,000 (P < .001). Longer preoperative length of stay, operating room time, and major postoperative morbidity including stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, reoperation, and deep sternal wound infection were associated with greater hospital charges. Incidence of major postoperative events, except stroke and deep sternal wound infection, was variable between hospitals. In a univariate linear regression model, patient risk profile only accounted for approximately 10% of statistical variance in charges. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant charge variability for coronary artery bypass grafting among hospitals within the same state. By targeting variation in preoperative length of stay, operating room time, postoperative renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and reoperation, cardiac surgery programs can realize cost savings while improving quality of care for this resource-intense patient population.

Number and Type of Blood Products Are Negatively Associated With Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The association between blood transfusion and adverse outcome is documented in cardiac surgery. However, the incremental significance of each unit transfused, whether red blood cell (RBC) or non-RBC, is uncertain. This study examined the relationship of patient outcomes with the type and number of blood product units transfused. METHODS: Statewide data from 24 082 adult cardiac surgery patients were included. The relationship with blood transfusion was assessed for morbidity and 30-day mortality using total number of RBC and non-RBC units transfused, specific type of non-RBC units, and different combinations of transfusion (only RBC, only non-RBC, RBC + non-RBC). Multivariable logistic regressions examined these associations. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years (30% female patients), and 51% of patients received a transfusion (31%-66% across hospitals). Risk-adjusted analyses found each blood product unit was associated with 9%, 7%, and 4% greater odds for 30-day mortality, major morbidity, and minor morbidity, respectively (all P < .001). Odds for 30-day mortality were 13% greater with each RBC unit (P < .001) and 6% greater for each non-RBC unit (P < .001). Each unit of fresh frozen plasma (P < .001) and platelets (P < .001) increased the odds for 30-day mortality, but no effect was found for cryoprecipitate (P = .725). Odds for 30-day mortality were lower for non-RBC-only (odds ratio, 0.52; P = .030) and greater for RBC + non-RBC (odds ratio, 2.98; P < .001) compared with RBC-only transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of center variability on transfusion methods, each additional unit transfused was associated with increased odds for complications, with RBC transfusion carrying greater risk compared with non-RBC. Comprehensive evidence-based clinical approaches and coordination are needed to guide each blood transfusion event after cardiac surgery.

Clinical Practice Variation and Outcomes for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Repair Surgery in Maryland: Report from a Statewide Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Stanford Type A aortic dissection repair surgery is associated with high mortality and clinical practice remains variable among hospitals. Few studies have examined statewide practice variation. METHODS: Patients who had Stanford Type A aortic dissection repair surgery in Maryland between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2018 were identified using the Maryland Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative (MCSQI) database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgery details, and outcomes were compared between hospitals. We also explored the impact of arterial cannulation site and brain protection technique on outcome. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included from eight hospitals during the study period. Seventy-six percent of surgeries were done in two high-volume hospitals (≥10 cases per year), while the remaining 24% were done in low-volume hospitals. Operative mortality was 12.0% and varied between 0 and 25.0% depending on the hospital. Variables that differed significantly between hospitals included patient age, the percentage of patients in shock, left ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine level, arterial cannulation site, brain protection technique, tobacco use, and intraoperative blood transfusion. The percentage of patients who underwent aortic valve repair or replacement procedures differed significantly between hospitals (p < 0.001), although the prevalence of moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency was not significantly different (p = 0.14). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes including mortality, renal failure, stroke, or gastrointestinal complications between hospitals or based on arterial cannulation site (all p > 0.05). Patients who had aortic cross-clamping or endovascualr repair had more embolic strokes when compared with patients who had hypothermic circulatory arrest (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: There remains considerable practice variation in Stanford Type A aortic dissection repair surgery within Maryland including some modifiable factors such as intraoperative blood transfusion, arterial cannulation site, and brain protection technique. Continued efforts are needed within MCSQI and nationally to evaluate and employ the best practices for patients having acute aortic dissection repair surgery.

Racial Disparity in Cardiac Surgery Risk and Outcome: Report From a Statewide Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities persist in health care. Our study objective was to evaluate racial disparity in cardiac surgery in Maryland. METHODS: A statewide database was used to identify patients. Demographics, comorbidities, and predicted risk of death were compared between races. Crude mortality and incidence of complications were compared between groups, as were risk-adjusted odds for mortality and major morbidity or mortality. RESULTS: The study included 23,094 patients. Most patients were white (75.8%), followed by African American (16.3%), Asian (3.8%), and other races (4.1%). African Americans had a higher preoperative risk for mortality based on The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive models compared with white patients (3.0% vs 2.3%, P < .001). African Americans also had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebral vascular disease than white patients. After adjustment for preoperative risk, there was no difference in 30-day mortality between African Americans (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.59), Asians (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.75-1.97), and other races (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.74-1.89) compared with whites. African Americans had lower risk-adjusted odds of major morbidity or mortality compared with whites (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: African American cardiac surgical patients have the highest preoperative risk in Maryland. Patients appeared to receive excellent cardiac surgical care, regardless of race, as risk-adjusted mortality did not differ between groups, and African American patients had lower risk-adjusted odds of major morbidity or mortality than white patients. Future interventions in Maryland should be aimed at reducing preoperative risk disparity in cardiac surgical patients.

Risk Aversion in Cardiac Surgery: 15-Year Trends in a Statewide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: With a rising emphasis on public reporting, we hypothesized that select hospitals are becoming increasingly risk-averse by avoiding high-risk operations. Further, we evaluated the association between risk-averse practices, outcomes, and publicly reported quality measures. METHODS: Clinical data from 78,417 patients undergoing cardiac surgery (2002-2016) from a regional consortium was paired with publicly available reimbursement and quality data. High-risk surgery was defined as predicted risk of mortality ≥5%. Hospital risk aversion was defined as a significant decrease in both high-risk volume and proportion, with cases stratified by hospital risk aversion status for univariate analysis. RESULTS: The rate of high-risk cases decreased from 17.9% in 2002 to 12.6% in 2016. Significant risk aversion was seen in 39% of hospitals, which had a 59% decrease in high-risk volume vs a 16% decrease at non-risk-averse hospitals. In the last 5 years, declining high-risk cases at risk-averse hospitals were driven by fewer cases from transfers (19.2% vs 28.1%, P < .001) and the emergency department (17.6% vs 19.2%, P = .001). Only non-risk-averse hospitals had mortality rates lower than expected (risk-averse: 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.03], P = .30; non-risk-averse: 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.94], P = .001). There were no differences by risk aversion status in reported ratings or financial incentives (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Over 60% of hospitals continue to operate on high-risk patients, with concentration of care driven by transfer patterns. These non-risk-averse hospitals are high-performing with better-than-expected outcomes, particularly in high-risk cases. Transparency and objectivity in reporting are essential to ensure continued access for these high-risk patients.

Current quality reporting methods are not adequate for salvage cardiac operations.

OBJECTIVES: Outcomes in cardiac surgery are benchmarked against national Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data and include patients undergoing elective, urgent, emergent, and salvage operations. This practice relies on accurate risk adjustment to avoid risk-averse behavior. We hypothesize that the STS risk calculator does not adequately characterize the risk of salvage operations because of their heterogeneity and infrequent occurrence. METHODS: Data on all cardiac surgery patients with an STS predicted risk score (2002-2017) were extracted from a regional database of 19 cardiac surgery centers. Patients were stratified according to operative status for univariate analysis. Observed-to-expected (O:E) ratios for mortality and composite morbidity/mortality were calculated and compared among elective, urgent, emergent, and salvage patients. RESULTS: A total of 76,498 patients met inclusion criteria. The O:E mortality ratios for elective, urgent, and emergent cases were 0.96, 0.98, and 0.93, respectively (all P values > .05). However, mortality rate was significantly higher than expected for salvage patients (O:E ratio, 1.41; P = .04). Composite morbidity/mortality rate was lower than expected in elective (O:E ratio, 0.81; P = .0001) and urgent (O:E ratio, 0.93; P = .0001) cases but higher for emergent (O:E ratio, 1.13; P = .0006) and salvage (O:E ratio, 1.24; P = .01). O:E ratios for salvage mortality were highly variable among each of the 19 centers. CONCLUSIONS: The current STS risk models do not adequately predict outcomes for salvage cardiac surgery patients. On the basis of these results, we recommend more detailed reporting of salvage outcomes to avoid risk aversion in these potentially life-saving operations.

Impact of transfer status on real-world outcomes in nonelective cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Transfer from hospital to hospital for cardiac surgery represents a large portion of some clinical practices. Previous literature in other surgical fields has shown worse outcomes for transferred patients. We hypothesized that transferred patients would be higher risk and demonstrate worse outcomes than those admitted through the emergency department. METHODS: All patients undergoing cardiac operations with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality were evaluated from a multicenter, statewide Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Only patients requiring admission before surgery were included. Patients were stratified by admission through the emergency department or in transfer. Transfers were further stratified by the cardiothoracic surgery capabilities at the referring center. RESULTS: A total of 13,094 patients met the inclusion criteria of admission before surgery. This included 7582 (57.9%) transfers, of which 502 (6.6%) were referred from cardiac centers. Compared with emergency department admissions, transfers had increased hospital costs despite lower operative risk (Predicted Risk of Mortality 1.5% vs 1.6%, P < .01) and equivalent postoperative morbidity (15.6% vs 15.3% P = .63). In risk-adjusted analysis, transfer status was not independently associated with worse outcomes. Patients transferred from centers that perform cardiac surgery are higher risk than general transfers (Predicted Risk of Mortality 2.5% vs 1.5, P < .01), but specialized care results in excellent risk-adjusted outcomes (observed/expected: mortality 0.81; morbidity or mortality 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Transfer patients have similar rates of postoperative complications but increased resource use compared with patients admitted through the emergency department. Patients transferred from centers that perform cardiac surgery represent a particularly high-risk subgroup.

Mitigating the Risk: Transfusion or Reoperation for Bleeding After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have established morbidity associated with bleeding after cardiac surgery. Although reoperation has been implicated as the marker for this morbidity, there remains limited understanding regarding relative morbidities of reoperation and substantial transfusion. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Maryland Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (July 2011-September 2018) was reviewed (N = 23,240). Substantial transfusion was defined as requiring greater than the reoperation group median red blood cells (5 units) and non-red blood cells (4 units). Patients were stratified into 4 subgroups: group 1, no reoperation without substantial transfusion (n = 22,365); group 2, reoperation without substantial transfusion (n = 351); group 3, no reoperation with substantial transfusion (n = 350); and group 4, reoperation with substantial transfusion (n = 167). Operative morbidity and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Reoperation patients were older with a higher STS predicted risk of mortality (1.8% vs 1.2%, P < .001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that group 4 increased the odds of renal failure (odds ratio [OR] 7.36, P < .001), stroke (OR 3.24, P = .002), and operative mortality (OR 8.68, P < .001) compared with group 1. Both group 2 and group 3 increased the odds of mortality and renal failure compared with group 1. However, group 3 had greater risk for renal failure (OR 3.48, P < .001) and mortality (OR 2.91, P < .001) than group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Although reoperation for bleeding is associated with morbidity after cardiac surgery, substantial transfusion without reoperation appears to increase morbidity compared with a limited-transfusion reoperative approach. Better timing for reoperation and guided transfusion approaches may mitigate morbidity compared with substantial transfusion alone.

Outcomes After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients With Prior Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Limited prior studies suggest patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and prior cardiac surgery are at increased risk for major complications compared with those without a prior sternotomy. We sought to investigate the impact of prior cardiac surgery on ATAAD outcomes across a multicenter regional consortium. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical intervention for ATAAD in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database between 2002 and 2017 were stratified by prior cardiac surgery (reoperative) status. Demographics, operative characteristics, outcomes and cost data were compared by univariate analysis. Multivariable regression models assessed risk-adjusted impact of reoperative status on outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,332 patients underwent surgery for ATAAD, of whom 138 (10.4%) were reoperations. Reoperative patients were older (63 vs. 58 years, p < 0.01) with more comorbidities. These patients had longer median cardiopulmonary bypass times (218 vs 177 minutes, p < 0.01) and increased blood product utilization; however rates of aortic arch, root, and valve procedures were similar. On unadjusted analysis operative mortality was higher in reoperative patients (28% vs 15%, p < 0.01) with a longer total length of stay (13 vs 10 days, p = 0.02). Reoperative patients exhibited a trend toward decreased mortality at high-volume centers (25.7% vs 37.9%, p = 0.19). After risk adjustment reoperative status remained associated with mortality (odds ratio, 2.1; p < 0.01) as well as composite morbidity-mortality (odds ratio, 2.2; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter cohort undergoing repair of ATAAD prior cardiac surgery was associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Centralization to high-volume centers and emerging technologies may improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Preoperative ß-blocker use correlates with worse outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: ß-Blocker use is associated with fewer cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and is a quality metric for coronary artery bypass grafting. We sought to determine the influence of preoperative ß-blocker administration before aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated AVR from 2002 to 2016 were extracted from a multi-institutional, statewide database composed of Society of Thoracic Surgeons data. Patients were propensity score matched by preoperative and operative variables, and the effects of preoperative ß-blockers on outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 7380 eligible patients, 53% received a preoperative ß-blocker. After propensity matching, a total of 4592 patients were well matched (1:1) with minimal baseline differences between groups. Within the matched cohort, the operative mortality rate (ß-blocker: 2.8% vs no ß-blocker: 2.4%; P = .454) and rate of major morbidity (14.4% vs 12.7%; P = .101) were similar between groups. The rates of cardiac arrest (2.1% vs 1.3%; P = .034), renal failure requiring dialysis (1.7% vs 0.9%; P = .007), and postoperative transfusion (38.2% vs 33.8%; P = .002) after AVR were significantly greater in the cohort receiving preoperative ß-blockade. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was also more prevalent in patients receiving a preoperative ß-blocker (26.9% vs 23.4%; P = .007). Finally, preoperative ß-blocker use was associated with longer postoperative intensive care unit stays (45.2 vs 47.0 hours; P = .001), but clinically similar hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ß-blocker administration is not associated with improved outcomes after AVR but instead is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Routinely initiating preoperative ß-blockade is not supported in patients undergoing AVR.

Variation in Platelet Transfusion Practices in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Although the morbidity associated with red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery has been well described, the impacts of platelet transfusion are less clearly understood. Given the conflicting results of prior studies, we sought to investigate the impact of platelet transfusion on outcomes after cardiac surgery across institutions in Maryland. METHODS: Using a multiinstitutional statewide database created by the Maryland Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative, we retrospectively analyzed data from 10,478 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass across 10 centers. Platelet transfusion practices were compared between institutions. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between platelet transfusion and 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Rates of platelet transfusion varied between institutions from 4.4% to 24.7% ( P < 0.001), a difference that remained statistically significant in propensity score-matched cohorts. Among patients on preoperative antiplatelet therapy, transfusion rates varied from 8.5% to 46.4% ( P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between case volume and transfusion rates ( P = 0.815). In multivariate logistic regression, platelet transfusion was associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 2.43, P = 0.008), postoperative pneumonia (OR 2.21, P = 0.004), prolonged intubation (OR 2.05, P < 0.001), and readmission (OR 1.43, P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation existed in platelet transfusion rates between institutions, even after controlling for various risk factors. This variation may be associated with increased mortality and length of stay. Further study is warranted to better understand risks associated with platelet transfusion. Standardizing practice may help reduce risk and conserve resources.

Socioeconomic Distressed Communities Index Predicts Risk-Adjusted Mortality After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The effects of socioeconomic factors other than insurance status and race on outcomes after cardiac operations are not well understood. We hypothesized that the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a comprehensive socioeconomic ranking by zip code, would predict operative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: All patients who underwent isolated CABG (2010 to 2017) in the Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative database were analyzed. The DCI accounts for unemployment, education level, poverty rate, median income, business growth, and housing vacancies, with scores ranging from 0 (no distress) to 100 (severe distress). Patients were stratified by DCI quartiles (I: 0 to 24.9, II: 25 to 49.9, III: 50 to 74.9, IV: 75 to 100) and compared. Hierarchical linear regression modeled the association between the DCI and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 19,756 CABG patients were analyzed, with mean predicted risk of mortality of 2.0% ± 3.5%. Higher DCI scores were associated with increasing predicted risk of mortality. Overall operative mortality was 2.1% (n = 424) and increased with increasing DCI quartile (I: 1.6% [n = 95], II: 2.1% [n = 77], III: 2.4% [n = 114], IV: 2.6% [n = 138]; p = 0.0009). The observed-to-expected ratio for mortality increased as level of socioeconomic distress increased. After risk adjustment for The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality, year of surgical procedure, and hospital, the DCI remained predictive of operative mortality after CABG (odds ratio, 1.14 for each 25-point increase in DCI; 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.26; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The DCI independently predicts risk-adjusted operative mortality after CABG. Socioeconomic status, although not part of traditional risk calculators, should be considered when building risk models, evaluating resource utilization, and comparing hospitals.

Is routine extubation overnight safe in cardiac surgery patients?

OBJECTIVES: Expedient extubation after cardiac surgery has been associated with improved outcomes, leading to postoperative extubation frequently during overnight hours. However, recent evidence in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit population demonstrated worse outcomes with overnight extubation. This study investigated the impact of overnight extubation in a statewide, multicenter Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. METHODS: Records from 39,812 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valve operations (2008-2016) and extubated within 24 hours were stratified according to extubation time between 06:00 and 18:00 (day) or between 18:00 and 6:00 (overnight). Outcomes including reintubation, mortality, and composite morbidity-mortality were evaluated using hierarchical regression models adjusted for Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk scores. To further analyze extubation during the night, a subanalysis stratified patients into 3 groups: 06:00 to 18:00, 18:00 to 24:00, and 24:00 to 06:00. RESULTS: A total of 20,758 patients were extubated overnight (52.1%) and were slightly older (median age 66 vs 65 years, P < .001) with a longer duration of ventilation (4 vs 7 hours, P < .001). Day and overnight extubation were associated with equivalent operative mortality (1.7% vs 1.7%, P = .880), reintubation (3.7% vs 3.4%, P = .141), and composite morbidity-mortality (8.2% vs 8.0%, P = .314). After risk adjustment, overnight extubation was not associated with any difference in reintubation, mortality, or composite morbidity-mortality. On subanalysis, those extubated between 24:00 and 06:00 exhibited increased composite morbidity-mortality (odds ratio, 1.18; P = .001) but no difference in reintubation or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Extubation overnight was not associated with increased mortality or reintubation. These results suggest that in the appropriate clinical setting, it is safe to routinely extubate cardiac surgery patients overnight.

Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use in Diabetic Patients: Friend or Foe?

BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting in diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting remains controversial. Our study compared morbidity and mortality between (1) diabetic and nondiabetic BIMA patients and (2) diabetic BIMA versus diabetic patients who underwent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting only. METHODS: Patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting from July 2011 to June 2016 at any of the 10 Maryland Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative centers were propensity scored across 16 variables. Diabetic BIMA patients were matched 1:1 by nearest neighbor matching to nondiabetic BIMA patients and were separately matched 1:1 to diabetic LIMA patients. We calculated observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for composite morbidity/mortality, operative mortality, unplanned reoperation, stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and deep sternal wound infection and compared ratios among matched populations. RESULTS: During the study period, 812 coronary artery bypass grafting patients received BIMA grafts, including 302 patients (37%) with diabetes. We matched 259 diabetic and nondiabetic BIMA patients. O/E ratios were higher in matched diabetic (versus nondiabetic) BIMA patients when comparing composite morbidity/mortality, reoperation, stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation (all O/E ratios >1.0); however, the O/E ratio for operative mortality was higher in nondiabetic BIMA patients. We additionally matched 292 diabetic BIMA to diabetic LIMA patients. Diabetic BIMA patients had a higher O/E ratio for composite morbidity/mortality, operative mortality, stroke, renal failure, and prolonged ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: In this statewide analysis, diabetic patients who received BIMA grafts (compared with diabetic patients with LIMA grafts or nondiabetic patients with BIMA grafts) had higher O/E ratios for composite morbidity/mortality as a result of higher O/E ratios for major complications.